No57

 

Disabled But Not Sub-Human

Posted at 23/06/11 - 12:01 PM

I don't watch the news programmes, or listen to them on the radio.  I don't even visit online news pages, which might seem a little unreasonable seeing that I run one myself.  It's not a Narcissus complex, however, but more because these other media give - in my NSH opinion - too much exposure to the sub-humans who live among us.

 

One of these sub-humans was recently quoted as saying that disabled people should work for less financial reward than ordinary AB folks because we can't do as much.  So, I would like to ask Mr Phil Davies of the Conservative (operative part of the word being "con") Party why his Department of our two-faced government is trying to compel genuinely disabled people to take up working positions in the able-bodied jobs market?  I figure this is a perfectly legitimate question because, faced with a personal computer on a desk, I can do just as much - and possibly more - work than an AB colleague.  Contrary to Mr Davies' party's wishes, though, I do not attempt to blag my way into a pigeonhole that is the wrong shape because, yes, there are some jobs that disabled folk cannot do as well as AB's.  Unlike Mr Davies and his sub-human colleagues, though, we disabled people have the intelligence to realise this.

 

As Mr D and his colleagues obviously do not share this level of intelligence with us, he and they must, by default, be declared sub-human because it would be very difficult indeed not to be any more stupid, idiotic or downright crass than he has shown them, and himself, to be.

Author: Editor

Previous Posts
TitleDate
Bar Rules10/06/11 - 10:00 PM137
News feed: RSS feed